🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented one MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain politicians to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that states globally are no longer content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.