🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.